This idea has been archived, contributions have been disabled 

Hi Thibaut!
Thanks for sharing your idea! You have really put a lot of thoughts into this and we really appreciate that! I wished I could say that this is something that we had in our plans but right now this is not in our roadmap. Lets keep an eye out and see what also other users think!

Best regards
Silvija

Comments (3)

Also some insiparation from the current Wikipedia's project (Wikidiata). I did not put it in the idea because this is probably too adanced for current needs.

It could be a good idea to propose type of database where fields usage on items are flexible. I mean that you have the basic fields and when a user create a new item in the database he can add a new field that will become an optional field for other items as well. This type of user contributed optional field can be hidden in a + button until it is officialised. This is very usefull for materials databases for examples since all types of materials don't have the same types of caracteristics available.

In a very advanced version, fields could have basic semantic relationship. For exemple :

Phone (physicial product)

  • Processor : Intel i10
  • Catalogues : Range 1, Range 2

Will become :

Phone (physicial product)

  • HAS Processor : Intel i10
  • IS PART OF Catalogues : Range 1, Range 2

This ise usefull later to make advanced searchs or to define a bill of materials.

Hi Thibaut!
Thanks for sharing your idea! You have really put a lot of thoughts into this and we really appreciate that! I wished I could say that this is something that we had in our plans but right now this is not in our roadmap. Lets keep an eye out and see what also other users think!

Best regards
Silvija

DIMELO - innovation management specialist