Comments (12)

We have "defined" dependencies between cards using comments in the description as well as a naming convention for the card, but it's very easy to overlook these mechanisms. Would be nice to have a way to bundle a few cards together and have the bundle represented in a way where it's easy to see the relationship.

Greetings Silvija, doesn't sound like your workaround is appropriate in the case when Plan Activities have been assigned? It would work if the User can assign to a Card multiple Plan Activities. Regards, Brandon

When working with many kinds of development there is a nomenclature used in many other systems where Features consists of User Stories, which consists of Tasks.

I fully agree with what has been requested above, but to further detail teh requirement it would be nive to have the possibility to have dependencies and types on cards.

Best regards
Henric Trolme

I would also like this functionality. We have people in different teams that need to wait for eachother to work on a card. With the suggested workarounds this is still prone to error (people simply don't read all details). I also thought of a workaround to assign a card on a hidden board or to put it in a hidden status column, but it cannot be done.